blo-aux pas
Is it wrong to go back and fix typos and missing links in previous posts?
As much as I love proofreading the writing of others, I hate re-reading my stuff, so I don't notice missing or mixed up letters til days or weeks later. I won't even start on the number of comma splices on my blog. But is that wrong? Is it like changing history?
Or is it like fixing a mistake in the next printing of a book?
As much as I love proofreading the writing of others, I hate re-reading my stuff, so I don't notice missing or mixed up letters til days or weeks later. I won't even start on the number of comma splices on my blog. But is that wrong? Is it like changing history?
Or is it like fixing a mistake in the next printing of a book?
Labels: on blogging, on me
posted by erika @ 5:02 PM
2 Comments:
At 9:12 AM,
Anonymous said…
As an obsessive re-editor and a fast typer, I say you're allowed. Its more like editing the next edition rather than altering history, esp. if you're just adding commas and what not. Edit away!
At 12:17 PM,
thisismarcus said…
Go for it. I do it all the time.
P.S. Happy birthday, Joe! I know you two are tight when Erika starts linking Star Wars humor.
Post a Comment
<< Home